Dialego - Gender and Politics
Chapter

Gender Quotas and Political Representation: Successes and Paradoxes Across Democracies

Sambhavi Ghoshal
Postgraduate Student, Postgraduate and Research Department of Political Science, St. Xaviers’ College (Autonomous) College, Kolkata
Banshikha Neog
Postgraduate Student, Postgraduate and Research Department of Political Science, St. Xaviers’ College (Autonomous) College, Kolkata

Published 27.07.2026

Keywords

  • Gender Quotas,
  • Women’s Political Representation,
  • Comparative Analysis

How to Cite

Ghoshal, S., & Neog, B. (2026). Gender Quotas and Political Representation: Successes and Paradoxes Across Democracies. Loreto College Academic Press, 189–202. Retrieved from https://loretocollegeacademicpress.com/index.php/lcap/article/view/36

Abstract

Over the past three decades, gender quotas have emerged as a key international policy instrument for increasing women’s political representation. The recognition that representative democracy lacks legitimacy when half of the population remains structurally excluded has driven demands for gender equality in political participation. Today, more than 110 countries have adopted gender quotas in various forms, including legislative quotas, reserved seats, and voluntary party quotas. These mechanisms have significantly enhanced the descriptive representation of women and, in many cases, strengthened the substantive articulation of gender-sensitive policies (Paxton, Hughes & Painter, 2009). However, despite their widespread adoption, the impact, enforcement, and design of quotas vary considerably across regions, producing notable paradoxes such as tokenism, elite capture, proxy representation, and resistance that limits women’s effective participation.

DOI - https://doi.org/10.66496/LCAP.9788168710122.2026.189-202